In Summary
The company
announced Mr Mwapachu’s departure in a brief statement posted on its website
yesterday. He was the only Tanzanian sitting in the company’s eight-member
board of directors.
Dar es
Salaam. Former East Africa Community (EAC) secretary-general Juma Mwapachu has
left the Acacia Mining board ahead of planned talks with the government over
the ban on exports of copper concentrates.
The company
announced Mr Mwapachu’s departure in a brief statement posted on its website
yesterday. He was the only Tanzanian sitting in the company’s eight-member
board of directors.
“Acacia
announces that following the expiry of his second three-year term of
appointment, Ambassador Mwapachu has decided to retire from the Acacia Board of
Directors with effect from July 13, 2017,” the statement said.
The board
acknowledged Mr Mwapachu’s “valuable commitment and support” to the company
during his tenure and wished him well.
But Mr
Mwapachu’s exit from the influential position is likely raise eyebrows, with
the former Tanzanian ambassador to France himself appearing to dispute the “retirement”
notion alluded to by Acacia.
In an
interview with The Citizen, Mr Mwapachu, while declining to offer his reasons
for leaving the Acacia board, questioned the wording of the statement released
by the mining firm.
“Kindly ask
the source (Acacia)…they can give you more details on the matter. Why did they
use the word ‘retirement’, for instance? I’m no longer in the board, and
there’s reason for that...Acacia can tell you what it is,” Mr Mwapachu said.
Efforts to
reach Acacia to provide further details were futile by the time of filing this
story.
The media’s
access to the company, especially in Tanzania, has been limited since its
dispute with the government started in March when President John Magufuli
banned the shipping put of copper concentrates.
Following Mr
Mwapachu’s departure, the number of board members is now down to seven, namely
four independent non-executive directors, two non-executive directors and one
executive director.
The
announcement came at a time talks between the government and Barrick Gold
Corporation are due to start any time. Barrick is Acacia’s parent company,
owning a 60 per cent stake in the business.
Mr Mwapachu
and Mr Deodatus Mwanyika, who is Acacia’s Vice President, Corporate Affairs,
were the senior-most Tanzanians in the company, and were expected to play a
pivotal role during negotiations.
Problems
between Acacia and the government began when President Magufuli stopped the
export of over 270 containers of mineral concentrates from Dar es Salaam Port.
The number
of blacklisted containers had risen to over 1,000 by the beginning of June,
with the company warning that operations at its Buzwagi and Bulyankulu mines
would be seriously affected. The firm also owns the North Mara gold mine.
President
Magufuli later formed two probe committees, with the first committee led by
Prof Abulkarim Mruma, declaring in May that the value of minerals in the copper
concentrate had been under-declared by up to 10 times.
The second
committee, led by Prof Nahemia Osoro, examined the economic and legal
frameworks around the exports and submitted its findings in the same month to
set the tone for the planned negotiations.
The second committee’s findings
concluded that Tanzania had lost Sh108 trillion since concentrate exports began
in the late 1990s.
Acacia has
disputed the findings of both committees, saying its operations in the country
have always been aboveboard and called for an independent inquiry.
The
government has, however, ignored the appeal and has instead focused on the
planned talks with Barrick to push for compensation and what it sees as better
deals.
Acacia,
which will play only a supportive role in the negotiations after the government
said it was not legally registered in Tanzania, has since filed for
arbitration.
The
arbitration announcement was made only a day after Parliament approved two
bills that sought to give Tanzanians absolute ownership of all natural
resources.
The Natural
Wealth and Resources Contracts (Review and Re-negotiation of Unconscionable
Terms) Bill, 2017 and the Natural Wealth and Resources (Permanent Sovereignty)
Bill, 2017, which have already been signed into law, have drawn varied
reaction, with foreign investors largely viewing them as anti-business.
But
local voices have praised them as a step in the right direction in the
country’s efforts to regain control of the management of natural resources.
The Citizen
No comments:
Post a Comment